<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CX7 | Visikol</title>
	<atom:link href="https://visikol.com/blog/tag/cx7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://visikol.com</link>
	<description>Advanced Drug Discovery and Bioimaging Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A Review of High Content Imagers for 3D Cell Culture Imaging</title>
		<link>https://visikol.com/blog/2020/02/24/a-review-of-high-content-imagers-for-3d-cell-culture-imaging/</link>
					<comments>https://visikol.com/blog/2020/02/24/a-review-of-high-content-imagers-for-3d-cell-culture-imaging/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D cell culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CX7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ImageXpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera Phenix]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://visikol.com/?p=13036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Visikol published a post in February 2020 titled, “A Review of High Content Imagers for 3D Cell Culture Imaging.” The Review, in which a small group of users showed a preference for ThermoFisher’s CX7 LZR product, made certain inaccurate statements about PerkinElmer’s Opera Phenix High Content Screening System, specifically that the instrument had average  [...]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-column-has-shadow fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-1"><p>Visikol published a post in February 2020 titled, “A Review of High Content Imagers for 3D Cell Culture Imaging.” The Review, in which a small group of users showed a preference for ThermoFisher’s CX7 LZR product, made certain inaccurate statements about PerkinElmer’s Opera Phenix High Content Screening System, specifically that the instrument had average down times as high as 30%. After the publication date, we were advised by PerkinElmer that the average down<br />
time for PerkinElmer’s Opera Phenix High Content Screening System is “significantly less than 30%.” Furthermore, we did not disclose in the Review that Visikol has a business relationship with ThermoFisher in relation to the distribution of tissue clearing products, and we apologize for this oversight. With apologies to PerkinElmer, we have removed the blog post and are issuing this retraction of the Review. As always, we would encourage prospective customers of a HCS imager<br />
to perform their own independent review and assessment of the offerings across the industry to determine the best product and vendor to meet their specific requirements.</p>
</div><div class="fusion-clearfix"></div></div></div></div></div>The post <a href="https://visikol.com/blog/2020/02/24/a-review-of-high-content-imagers-for-3d-cell-culture-imaging/">A Review of High Content Imagers for 3D Cell Culture Imaging</a> first appeared on <a href="https://visikol.com">Visikol</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://visikol.com/blog/2020/02/24/a-review-of-high-content-imagers-for-3d-cell-culture-imaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
