Positive controls in IF labeling are tissue samples known to contain the protein of interest. Positive controls are labeled in the same manner as the experimental samples. The primary purpose of positive controls is to ensure that an antibody can successfully recognize and bind to the specific protein it is designed to detect. A strong and specific signal in positive control samples confirms that the antibody is capable of detecting the target protein. On the other hand, the absence of signal in the positive controls may raise concerns about the antibody’s efficacy or the labeling process. Positive controls are a reliable benchmark for evaluating the success of immunofluorescence labeling.
Secondary controls are critical in determining antibody specificity used in the immunofluorescence experiment. These controls are typically additional samples of client tissue that are utilized to determine the presence of non-specific antibody binding. Instead of being labeled in the same manner as the experimental slides, secondary control slides only receive the secondary antibody. If signal is detected in these controls, it indicates that the secondary antibodies are non-specifically binding to the sample. Non-specific binding occurs when an antibody attaches to structures other than the intended target, leading to false-positive signals. Suppose there is no detectable signal in the secondary only controls. In that case, it indicates that the antibody is not binding non-specifically to other components in the sample, reducing the risk of false-positive results. Any observed signal in the secondary controls warrants further investigation into potential non-specific binding issues of the secondary antibodies.
Unlabeled controls undergo the same labeling procedure as the experimental samples but do not have antibodies applied to them. The primary purpose of unlabeled controls is to distinguish between true labeling and autofluorescence. Autofluorescence refers to the inherent fluorescence emitted by specific tissues or compounds, which can interfere with detecting actual labeling signal. If the unlabeled control shows minimal to no autofluorescence, it suggests that any observed signal in the experimental samples is likely due to the actual labeling of the target protein. On the other hand, a high level of autofluorescence in the unlabeled controls could indicate issues with the preparation or fixation of the tissues.
In conclusion, implementing positive, secondary, and unlabeled controls is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable results in IF tissue labeling. Positive controls validate the functionality of the antibody, ensuring its ability to recognize and bind to the target antigen. Secondary controls help identify non-specific binding and minimize the risk of false-positive signals. Unlabeled controls allow researchers to differentiate true labeling from autofluorescence arising from the experimental process itself. By incorporating these three types of controls, researchers can confidently interpret immunofluorescence results and draw meaningful conclusions from their experiments. Moreover, the rigorous use of controls enhances data reproducibility and scientific rigor in IF labeling.
If you’re interested in learning more, please reach out to member of our team today!